Note: The following was written by Jim around 2012, and we are putting it here as food for thought. The subject of “nutrition” in the world today, is quite subjective, with a wide range of factors weighing into this equation, such as how the food is grown, handled, stored, processed, etc. etc. In addition, we remind you that the nutritional needs of each individual can vary greatly. Whatever diet you might settle on, we do encourage you to eat real food, sustainably grown and free of additives, as much as possible.

The use of MMS has brought to light information concerning nutrition that was never suspected before. Of course, unfortunately, the absence of millions of dollars for research makes us rely on empirical data, but that is often quite reliable. It is often ridiculed by medical authorities, but they have a reason. Maybe you can guess what that is—in any case, here is some interesting nutritional information that I feel is important:

I believe that once all or most of the pathogens have been removed, the human body can sometimes generate nutritional components that are absent from the diet. Why do I think that? In a number of different situations in Africa, when it became obvious that the protocol we were using had killed most of the pathogens present, the individual quickly became very healthy with lots of energy. Their diet did not change. This happened hundreds of times. Once all the diseases in the body were killed, the person quickly became healthy, at least the doctor and all the people around us were convinced that these people were healthy. I certainly was convinced.

How could that be? The nutrition in those areas has always been considered very inferior, yet these people apparently overcame deficiencies and were obviously healthy. Keep in mind that throughout the years when nutritionalists were explaining how poor nutrition caused certain diseases, there were always some who were eating the same diet but who were healthy. No one ever really mentioned that. That data has always been ignored.

If poor nutrition always brought about poor health, then wouldn’t all the people in the area be unhealthy? It is becoming obvious to me, and hopefully researchers will check this out, that what is generally considered good nutrition is nutrition that helps prevent the growth of pathogens in the body. Of course, the healthier the body is, the healthier the immune system is, and pathogens have less chance to grow. But in addition to that, the more natural and real the foods are, the less likely it is that bacteria and other microorganisms will feed on them.

One explanation is that the body can generate the necessary nutritional components. You may ridicule that idea (as some do), but then look at the chicken. Put a chicken in an environment where there is no calcium, and feed it calcium free food, and it will produce eggs with a calcium shell until more shells have been produced than the calcium in the bones of the chicken. This has been done many times and the explanation is that the chicken changes phosphorus into calcium. Most foods have some phosphorus and meats, milk, nuts, beans, lentils and whole grains are especially high in phosphorous. There are dozens of other examples of various animals changing one element into another. Science doesn’t recognize it, but they certainly can’t explain it either.

If there is another explanation why thousands of people become healthy after the diseases in their bodies are gone, and without changing their diets, then that should be researched also.